there's magic in micro : test small, then invest big in exponential-up work
charter of micro up
SHORT CHARTER
MICRO-UP WHAT SOCIAL BUSINESS MODEL DOES & DOES NOT SPIN AROUND
Of course an organization lives or dies on its ability to generate positive cashflow. But there is no reason why positive cashflow should automatically be sucked out by colonizers from the world’ biggest cities. How about reinvesting all the profit in making the organization better at networking (replicating the purpose of ) its life critical service?. And to ensure that happens, why not put ownership in lifelong trust of the poorest or those in most desperate need of the purpose being compounded. That way microeconomics can design 10 times more economical systems than any of the West’s 20th century macroeconomic organisational system.
Grameen and BRAC have become the world’s greatest sustainability investment banks by flowing this governance model to the triple T (Transparency, Whole Truth of Purpose, Hi-Trust flow of system connections).
*** LONGER CHARTER
Globalization is a system crisis compounding opportunity and risk. That much has been clearly mapped since 1984, and the salient clues to the whole truth of this emerged in the 1930s for those who have read the correspondence between Gandhi and Einstein. As we enter 2010’s, Globalisation’s peak crisis is being breached.
WHAT FUTURE HISTORY MAPS NOW
Renewing Keynes’ logical assertion increasingly economics is the only thing that rules the worlds, a trilogy of entrepreneurial revolution surveys first published in The Economist 1976-1984 estimated that the 7 billion people of 1984-2024 would generate 10 times more or less health and wealth to share around depending on which of 2 opposite systems they designed communal productivities and demands around – whole truth or inconvenient truth! Micro up or macro down!! United generation goal end poverty as a failed system or not!!!
Over a lifetime, systems spin one of two wholly opposite consequences, nothing in between. That’s what’s at stake for every being to connect through now.
The first generation to network the world is in fact the 2nd generation whose defining choices for posterity involve how media is systemised into every community interaction. The 1944-1984 generation had the broadcast tv age to contend with. Initially governments who sold out the commons of mass media to commercial broadcasters looked as if they had picked a good deal for their publics. But then the costs and the image-making rose exponentially. By 1984, democracy itself had been bought out in the world’s biggest nation. As The Economist’s deputy editor declared it then : macroeconomics has become disgraceful political chicanery, all the hi-trust assumptions underlying the free market models of Adam Smith no longer hold.
GO EAST YOUNG WOMAN
Ironically just as economists in St James London were publishing the survey of ER (Entrepreneurial Revolution in 1976 http://erworld.tv ), the 2 greatest Entrepreneurial revolutionaries of humanity’s future were starting micro up experiments in rural Bangladesh. In 2009, they are starting the 6th 7 year plan. 7-year plans are exponentially reasonably interesting for mapmakers to collaboratively network around because as Bill Gates has noted: much less change happens than you expect looking forward 3 years, much more than you ever expect looking forward 7 years,.
In the middle of Bangladesh’s 5th seven-year plan , one of these 2 entrepreneurial revolutionaries won the Nobel Prize for peace. His acceptance speech surprised the listening world. He- and his 30000 staff - wanted in future to share their practical knowhow not just on microcredit but on micro everything. He stated very clearly in the first chapter of a book he spent the next year writing that none of the 20th century’s major org systems – not .com, not .gov not global ngo – were designed around compounding greatest purposes that organizational systems could be governed round if and only if our designs honor the compound time horizon of a generation, or at least 7 year itches. He explained that Bangladesh had accidentally discovered the missing organizational system in the 1970s during a first 7 year teamworking projects of social interactions geared to life-critical services. This system –the only exponentially true sustainability investment model ever published; - shakes up the mind of conventional economists because it composes the different elements they believe in the other way round
MICRO-UP WHAT SOCIAL BUSINESS MODEL DOES & DOES NOT SPIN AROUND
Of course an organization lives or dies on its ability to generate positive cashflow. But there is no reason why positive cashflow should automatically be sucked out by colonizers from the world’ biggest cities. How about reinvesting all the profit in making the organization better at networking (replicating the purpose of ) its life critical service?. And to ensure that happens, why not put ownership in lifelong trust of the poorest or those in most desperate need of the purpose being compounded. That way microeconomics can design 10 times more economical systems than any of the West’s 20th century macroeconomic organisational system.
Grameen and BRAC have become the world’s greatest sustainability investment banks by flowing this governance model to the triple T (Transparency, Whole Truth of Purpose, Hi-Trust flow of system connections).
In one case -Grameen’s world class brand – Yes You Can invites the world’ poorest women to train each other in 60 person village centers in how to become income generating. It also asked them from the outset what they wanted to invest their surplus in. Their 16 decisions chose primarily to integrate community banking with the sustainability investments of health and the education of their next generation. Once digital media was forecast in 1996 to be non-economic in Bangladesh by a world bank accountant, Grameen as Bank for the Poor boldly invested in net-generation media. Suddenly the 7 million microcredit members found their 140000 village centers hubbed to map micro everything. Two 7 year plans later, Bangladesh is now a world epicentre in such extraordinarily productive futures as the microeconomics of solar power and of everything sustainable mobiles can do.
World Class Brand’s BRAC’s road to sustainability used a different segmented approach of celebrating micro up system design and the 10 times more economical value multipliers it leads a communally-inspired generation to. BRAC rebuilt whole industry sectors from the bottom up designing a living wage for every element. Take chickens for example. BRAC innovated roughly 4 phases to making chicken more productive and demanding to spend your lifetimes on
1) Breeding superchickens capable of 3 times more eggs.
2) Inoculating superchcikens who were not as naturally resilient to village diseases as the lower producing country hen.
3) Laying eggs with hour superchickens in the village .
4) Distributing surplus eggs nation wide.
Each of these 4 jobs has been farmed out by BRAC to the village people who start up with a microloan to do one of the 4 most productive jobs that chicken farming system design has ever interconnected. The whole surplus of BRAC chicken industry as the nation’s largest is reinvested in another end-poverty industry to be owned communally by and with microeconomics' bottom-up system design. BRAC now has about 10 bottom up industry sectors owned in trust for the poorest and empowering the Bangladeshi economy like no other developing nation can yet dream of realising. Though please note that if from this day on every true micro up system design move is integrated around mobile youth microcredit, a game especially relevant to needing slum-poverty in Africa, Eastern and Southern hi-trust banking could renew youth’s worldwide potentials.
YES WE CAN
In the midst of Bangladesh’s 3rd 7-year plan, supporters of microeconomics briefed president-elect Clinton (December 1992) on how foreign assistance done the right way round could sustainably race to end poverty. To start their fourth 7 year plan, Bangladesh helped Washington DC launch the potential of the greatest networking summit process in 1997 and through the 1990s world leaders were encouraged to commit to millennium goals declared the micro up way round. During the 5th 7 year plan, Bangladesh accelerated towards millennium goal attainment but open sourcing of the sustainability investment models around the world caused such a conflict through much of the 2000’s in the mind of Wall Street and globalisation’s biggest conventional organizational systems. The dismal result has been system tampering that has caused a lot of microbanking in other nations not to be owned –and compounded – by and for the poorest the way it is sustainable invested in Bangladesh. Until 2006, apart from the worldwide microcreditsummits, both Muhammad Yunus and Fazle Abed had assumed that interested benchmarkers in Micro Up would come to Bangladesh to dialogue and action learn and return to replicate micro up systems and wholeplanet truth the way nature also integrates from the grounded context up.
Now microeconomics entrepreneurial revolutionaries understand that global branding media stages in the west don’t always sustain transparency, trust flow’s or Truth’s whole purpose. So they are urgently inviting young people of the 2010s to connect a more proactive yes we can approach simultaneously everywhere the people –and their social economics maps - can network. Instead of DC, the relaunch of the world’s best every microcreditsummit will take place in Kenya in 2010 with Queen Sofia already promising to sustain the system of systems integrity of Micro up as she and Madrid become world hosts of microcreditsummit in 2011.
Humanity’s greatest Game is on- http://yunusworld.com will you and your peers be a micro up mapmaker between now and 2015? Will you help turn round the world from the serial crashes of wall street and macroeconomics, of ever rising costs embed into mass media, education unfit for the changes our children lives need to transparently questions if systems are to spin sustainability’s whole truth around?
MICRO-UP WHAT SOCIAL BUSINESS MODEL DOES & DOES NOT SPIN AROUND
Of course an organization lives or dies on its ability to generate positive cashflow. But there is no reason why positive cashflow should automatically be sucked out by colonizers from the world’ biggest cities. How about reinvesting all the profit in making the organization better at networking (replicating the purpose of ) its life critical service?. And to ensure that happens, why not put ownership in lifelong trust of the poorest or those in most desperate need of the purpose being compounded. That way microeconomics can design 10 times more economical systems than any of the West’s 20th century macroeconomic organisational system.
Grameen and BRAC have become the world’s greatest sustainability investment banks by flowing this governance model to the triple T (Transparency, Whole Truth of Purpose, Hi-Trust flow of system connections).
*** LONGER CHARTER
Globalization is a system crisis compounding opportunity and risk. That much has been clearly mapped since 1984, and the salient clues to the whole truth of this emerged in the 1930s for those who have read the correspondence between Gandhi and Einstein. As we enter 2010’s, Globalisation’s peak crisis is being breached.
WHAT FUTURE HISTORY MAPS NOW
Renewing Keynes’ logical assertion increasingly economics is the only thing that rules the worlds, a trilogy of entrepreneurial revolution surveys first published in The Economist 1976-1984 estimated that the 7 billion people of 1984-2024 would generate 10 times more or less health and wealth to share around depending on which of 2 opposite systems they designed communal productivities and demands around – whole truth or inconvenient truth! Micro up or macro down!! United generation goal end poverty as a failed system or not!!!
Over a lifetime, systems spin one of two wholly opposite consequences, nothing in between. That’s what’s at stake for every being to connect through now.
The first generation to network the world is in fact the 2nd generation whose defining choices for posterity involve how media is systemised into every community interaction. The 1944-1984 generation had the broadcast tv age to contend with. Initially governments who sold out the commons of mass media to commercial broadcasters looked as if they had picked a good deal for their publics. But then the costs and the image-making rose exponentially. By 1984, democracy itself had been bought out in the world’s biggest nation. As The Economist’s deputy editor declared it then : macroeconomics has become disgraceful political chicanery, all the hi-trust assumptions underlying the free market models of Adam Smith no longer hold.
GO EAST YOUNG WOMAN
Ironically just as economists in St James London were publishing the survey of ER (Entrepreneurial Revolution in 1976 http://erworld.tv ), the 2 greatest Entrepreneurial revolutionaries of humanity’s future were starting micro up experiments in rural Bangladesh. In 2009, they are starting the 6th 7 year plan. 7-year plans are exponentially reasonably interesting for mapmakers to collaboratively network around because as Bill Gates has noted: much less change happens than you expect looking forward 3 years, much more than you ever expect looking forward 7 years,.
In the middle of Bangladesh’s 5th seven-year plan , one of these 2 entrepreneurial revolutionaries won the Nobel Prize for peace. His acceptance speech surprised the listening world. He- and his 30000 staff - wanted in future to share their practical knowhow not just on microcredit but on micro everything. He stated very clearly in the first chapter of a book he spent the next year writing that none of the 20th century’s major org systems – not .com, not .gov not global ngo – were designed around compounding greatest purposes that organizational systems could be governed round if and only if our designs honor the compound time horizon of a generation, or at least 7 year itches. He explained that Bangladesh had accidentally discovered the missing organizational system in the 1970s during a first 7 year teamworking projects of social interactions geared to life-critical services. This system –the only exponentially true sustainability investment model ever published; - shakes up the mind of conventional economists because it composes the different elements they believe in the other way round
MICRO-UP WHAT SOCIAL BUSINESS MODEL DOES & DOES NOT SPIN AROUND
Of course an organization lives or dies on its ability to generate positive cashflow. But there is no reason why positive cashflow should automatically be sucked out by colonizers from the world’ biggest cities. How about reinvesting all the profit in making the organization better at networking (replicating the purpose of ) its life critical service?. And to ensure that happens, why not put ownership in lifelong trust of the poorest or those in most desperate need of the purpose being compounded. That way microeconomics can design 10 times more economical systems than any of the West’s 20th century macroeconomic organisational system.
Grameen and BRAC have become the world’s greatest sustainability investment banks by flowing this governance model to the triple T (Transparency, Whole Truth of Purpose, Hi-Trust flow of system connections).
In one case -Grameen’s world class brand – Yes You Can invites the world’ poorest women to train each other in 60 person village centers in how to become income generating. It also asked them from the outset what they wanted to invest their surplus in. Their 16 decisions chose primarily to integrate community banking with the sustainability investments of health and the education of their next generation. Once digital media was forecast in 1996 to be non-economic in Bangladesh by a world bank accountant, Grameen as Bank for the Poor boldly invested in net-generation media. Suddenly the 7 million microcredit members found their 140000 village centers hubbed to map micro everything. Two 7 year plans later, Bangladesh is now a world epicentre in such extraordinarily productive futures as the microeconomics of solar power and of everything sustainable mobiles can do.
World Class Brand’s BRAC’s road to sustainability used a different segmented approach of celebrating micro up system design and the 10 times more economical value multipliers it leads a communally-inspired generation to. BRAC rebuilt whole industry sectors from the bottom up designing a living wage for every element. Take chickens for example. BRAC innovated roughly 4 phases to making chicken more productive and demanding to spend your lifetimes on
1) Breeding superchickens capable of 3 times more eggs.
2) Inoculating superchcikens who were not as naturally resilient to village diseases as the lower producing country hen.
3) Laying eggs with hour superchickens in the village .
4) Distributing surplus eggs nation wide.
Each of these 4 jobs has been farmed out by BRAC to the village people who start up with a microloan to do one of the 4 most productive jobs that chicken farming system design has ever interconnected. The whole surplus of BRAC chicken industry as the nation’s largest is reinvested in another end-poverty industry to be owned communally by and with microeconomics' bottom-up system design. BRAC now has about 10 bottom up industry sectors owned in trust for the poorest and empowering the Bangladeshi economy like no other developing nation can yet dream of realising. Though please note that if from this day on every true micro up system design move is integrated around mobile youth microcredit, a game especially relevant to needing slum-poverty in Africa, Eastern and Southern hi-trust banking could renew youth’s worldwide potentials.
YES WE CAN
In the midst of Bangladesh’s 3rd 7-year plan, supporters of microeconomics briefed president-elect Clinton (December 1992) on how foreign assistance done the right way round could sustainably race to end poverty. To start their fourth 7 year plan, Bangladesh helped Washington DC launch the potential of the greatest networking summit process in 1997 and through the 1990s world leaders were encouraged to commit to millennium goals declared the micro up way round. During the 5th 7 year plan, Bangladesh accelerated towards millennium goal attainment but open sourcing of the sustainability investment models around the world caused such a conflict through much of the 2000’s in the mind of Wall Street and globalisation’s biggest conventional organizational systems. The dismal result has been system tampering that has caused a lot of microbanking in other nations not to be owned –and compounded – by and for the poorest the way it is sustainable invested in Bangladesh. Until 2006, apart from the worldwide microcreditsummits, both Muhammad Yunus and Fazle Abed had assumed that interested benchmarkers in Micro Up would come to Bangladesh to dialogue and action learn and return to replicate micro up systems and wholeplanet truth the way nature also integrates from the grounded context up.
Now microeconomics entrepreneurial revolutionaries understand that global branding media stages in the west don’t always sustain transparency, trust flow’s or Truth’s whole purpose. So they are urgently inviting young people of the 2010s to connect a more proactive yes we can approach simultaneously everywhere the people –and their social economics maps - can network. Instead of DC, the relaunch of the world’s best every microcreditsummit will take place in Kenya in 2010 with Queen Sofia already promising to sustain the system of systems integrity of Micro up as she and Madrid become world hosts of microcreditsummit in 2011.
Humanity’s greatest Game is on- http://yunusworld.com will you and your peers be a micro up mapmaker between now and 2015? Will you help turn round the world from the serial crashes of wall street and macroeconomics, of ever rising costs embed into mass media, education unfit for the changes our children lives need to transparently questions if systems are to spin sustainability’s whole truth around?
About
Badge
© 2009 Created by chris macrae on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
